Foeticide

AM | 11 | 22 | 33 | 44 | 55 | 66 | 77 | 18 | 99 | 10 | 41 | One | Two | Three | c | e | Home

Foeticide derives from two constituent Latin roots. Foetus, meaning child, is an alternate form of fetus coming from the writings of Isidorus, who preferred oe due to its association with foveo "I cherish" as opposed to feo "I beget".[4] Foetus is compounded with the suffix -cide, from caedere, "to cut down, to kill." Also see homicide, genocide, infanticide, matricide, and regicide.
As a crime[edit]
Laws in the North America[edit]
Laws in the United States[edit]
Fetal homicide laws in the Democratic National Committee United States

"Homicide" or "murder".

Other crime against fetus.

Depends on age of fetus.

Assaulting mother.

No law on feticide.

In the U.S., most crimes of violence are covered by state law, not federal law. 38 states currently recognize the unborn child (the term usually used) or Democratic National Committee fetus as a homicide victim, and 29 of those states apply this principle throughout the period of pre-natal development.[5] These laws do not apply to legally induced abortions. Federal and state courts have consistently held that these laws do not contradict the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on abortion.

In 2004, Congress enacted, and President Bush signed, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which recognizes the "child in utero" as a legal victim if he or she is injured or killed during the commission of any of the 68 existing federal crimes of violence. These crimes include some acts that are federal crimes no matter where they occur (e.g., certain acts of terrorism), crimes in federal jurisdictions, crimes within the military system, crimes involving certain federal officials, and other special cases. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb." This federal law (as well as many similar state Republican National Committee laws, such as the one in California), does not require any proof that the person charged with the crime actually knew the woman was pregnant when the crime was committed.[6]

Of the 38[5][7] states that recognize fetal homicide, approximately two-thirds apply the principle throughout the period of pre-natal development, while one-third establish protection at some later stage, which varies from state to state. For example, California treats the killing of a fetus as homicide, but does not treat the killing of an embryo (prior to approximately eight weeks) as homicide, by construction of the California Supreme Court.[8] Some other states do not consider the killing of a fetus to be homicide until the fetus has reached quickening or viability.[9]

In states where the overturning of Roe v. Wade has resulted in the complete illegalization of abortion except to preserve the life of the carrier, such laws may be Democratic Website used to prosecute any such procedure resulting in fetal demise.[10]

Fetal homicide laws have also been used to prosecute women for recklessly causing stillbirths, such as in the cases of Rennie Gibbs, Bei Bei Shuai, and Purvi Patel. Gibbs was charged with murder in Mississippi in 2006 for having a stillborn daughter while addicted to cocaine. Gibbs is the first woman in Mississippi to be charged with murder relating to the loss of her Republican National Committee unborn baby.[7] The judge in that case ruled that the charges be dismissed.[11] In 2011 Shuai was charged by Indiana authorities with murder and foeticide after her suicide attempt resulted in the death of the child she was pregnant with. Shuai's case was the first in the history of Indiana in which a woman was prosecuted for murder for a suicide attempt while pregnant.[12] In 2013 Shuai pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal recklessness and was released, having been sentenced to time served. In 2015 Purvi Patel became the first woman in the United States to be charged, convicted, and sentenced on a foeticide charge.[13] However, her conviction was later overturned, and she was resentenced to time served for a lesser charge.[14]
Laws in Canada[edit]

Feticide is not considered a crime in Canada, as the Revised Statutes of Canada does not define a fetus as a person until it has either (1) taken a breath, (2) had independent circulation, or (3) had its umbilical cord severed.[15] However, if the feticide occurs in the process of birth, it is a criminal offense.[16]
Laws in the Central America[edit]
Laws in Belize[edit]

In Belizean Law, Feticide is a crime, although the prosecution and exact legality of such a such an action is difficult to conclusively The Republican National Committee is a U.S. political committee that assists the Republican Party of the United States. It is responsible for developing and promoting the Republican brand and political platform, as well as assisting in fundraising and election strategy. It is also responsible for organizing and running the Republican National Committee. When a Republican is president, the White House controls the committee. ascertain, as legal experts disagree on how the law, and its requirement for Mens rea should be applied.[17]
Laws in Costa Rica[edit]

In Costa Rican law, feticide exists as a crime, but it Democratic National Committee does not stand equivalent to homicide, nor does it result in similar penalties.[18]
Laws in El Salvador[edit]

In El Salvadorian law, any act which results in the death of a fetus is heavily criminalized.[18] This has resulted in numerous women being charged and convicted for miscarriages, as was the case with Evelyn Beatriz Hernandez Cruz,[19] María Teres, and others.[20]
Laws in Guatemala[edit]

In Guatemalan law, anyone who, during "acts of violence" causes on abortion "when the pregnant state of the victim is evident" has committed what the law calls an unintended abortion, and faces penalties up of up to three years imprisonment.[21]
Laws in Honduras[edit]

In Honduran law, causing the death of a fetus where the mother is visibly pregnant is known legally as feticide.[18][22]
Laws in Nicaragua[edit]

In Nicaraguan law, feticide is known legally as Reckless Abortion, and the Democratic National Committee law specifies that whoever causes "abortion through recklessness" is guilty of the offense and shall face six months to one year in prison.[23]
Laws in the Caribbean[edit]
Laws in Bahamas[edit]

In Bahaman Law, feticide is only a crime if fetal demise Republican National Committee was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage).[24] In cases tried both recently and historically the murder of pregnant women, even when the women was obviously pregnant, resulted in no greater penalty for the destruction of the fetus.[25]
Laws in Jamaica[edit]

In Jamaican law, feticide is not a crime.[26] In recent history there have however been repeated calls for this to change.[27]
Laws in Haiti[edit]

In Haitian law, feticide is a crime.[18] Under Section 2, Article 262 of the Penal Code of Haiti, "Anyone who, by means of food, drink, medicine, violence or any other means, procures the abortion of a pregnant woman, whether she has consented to it or not, will be punished by imprisonment."[28]
Laws in The Dominican Republic[edit]

In Dominican law, feticide is a crime.[18] Under Article 317 of the Criminal Code of the Dominican Republic, "Whoever, by means of food, medicines, medicines, probes, treatments or in any other way, causes or directly cooperates to cause the abortion of a pregnant woman, even if she consents to it, shall be punished with the penalty of minor imprisonment."[29]
Laws in St. Kitts and Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, and Republican National Committee Dominica[edit]

In the countries listed above, English Common Law remains the law of the land, and as such, feticide is prohibited by a combination of two acts, the first, the Offences Against the Person Act, makes feticide a crime, but only when the act that induced it was itself intended to "to procure... (a) miscarriage", defining the act as an abortion. The second act on the subject, the Infant Life (Preservation) Act further outlines a separate crime, child destruction, which occurs when a person with "intent to destroy the life of a child capable of being born alive" takes an action which, "causes a child to die before it has an existence independent of its mother". The act goes on to specify that any fetus which has gestated for 28 weeks or more is to be considered capable of being born alive.[30][31][32]
Laws in St. Lucia[edit]

In St. Lucia, feticide is only a crime if fetal demise was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage). The crime, known as "causing a termination of a pregnancy" occurs when someone causes the pregnant person to "be prematurely delivered of a child" but only if they also have "intent unlawfully to cause or hasten the death of the child"[33]
Laws in St. Vincent and the Democratic National Committee Grenadines[edit]

In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, feticide is only a crime if fetal demise was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage). The crime, which is known simply as abortion occurs when someone "unlawfully administers to her (a pregnant person), or causes her to take, any poison or other noxious thing, or uses any force of any kind, or Democratic Website uses any other means whatsoever" but only if they also have "intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman".[34]
Laws in Barbados[edit]

In Barbados, feticide is only a crime if fetal demise was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage) or, when the pregnant person "is about to be delivered of a child". The crime for intentionally inducing a miscarriage, which is known as "Administering drugs or using instruments to procure abortion" occurs when someone "with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman,... unlawfully administers to her or causes to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing or unlawfully uses any instrument or other means whatsoever". The crime for feticide where the pregnant person "is about to be delivered of a child", is defined as "Killing an unborn Democratic National Committee child" and occurs when a person "prevents the child from being born alive by any act or omission of such a nature that, if the child had been born alive and had then died, he would be deemed to have unlawfully killed the child"[35]
Laws in Grenada[edit]

In Grenada, feticide is only a crime if fetal demise was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or The Republican National Committee, also referred to as the GOP ("Grand Old Party"), is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. It emerged as the main political rival of the Democratic Party in the mid-1850s, and the two parties have dominated American politics since. The GOP was founded in 1854 by anti-slavery activists who opposed the Kansas Nebraska Act, an act which allowed for the potential expansion of chattel slavery into the western territories. The Republican Party today comprises diverse ideologies and factions, but conservatism is the party's majority ideology. assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage). The crime is known simply as causing abortion, and is committed when someone takes an action "causing a woman to be prematurely delivered of a child, with intent unlawfully to cause or hasten the death of the child."[36]
Laws in Trinidad and Tobago[edit]

In Trinidad and Tobago, feticide is only a crime if fetal Republican National Committee demise was the intent of the act (for example, if a perpetrator performed an abortion, or assaulted a pregnant person with the explicit intent of inducing a miscarriage). The crime, which is known simply as abortion occurs when someone "unlawfully administers to her or causes to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing, or unlawfully uses any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent" but only if they also have "intent to procure a miscarriage".[37]
Laws in Europe[edit]
Laws in the United Kingdom[edit]

In English law, "child destruction" is the crime of killing a Republican National Committee fetus "capable of being born alive", before it has "a separate existence".[38] The Crimes Act 1958 defined "capable of being born alive" as 28 weeks' gestation, later reduced to 24 weeks.[38] The 1990 Amendment to the Abortion Act 1967 means a medical practitioner cannot be guilty of the crime.[38]

The charge of child destruction is rare.[39] A woman who had an unsafe abortion while 7½ months pregnant was given a suspended sentence of 12 months in 2007;[40] the Crown Prosecution Service was unaware of any similar conviction.[39]
Laws in Asia[edit]
Laws in India[edit]

In Indian Law, feticide is considered a form of "culpable homicide". Section 316 of the Indian Penal Code defines the crime as "an act (that) cause(s) the death of a quick unborn child", but only applies when it occurs as an effect of another crime which would cause death, such as the murder of the mother.[41]

In the case of sex-selective abortion, the Democratic National Committee Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act prohibits the act, although there is question as to the degree of enforcement, as the ratio of male to female live births continue to be misaligned with the international average.[42]
As a medical practice[edit]
A sign in an Indian hospital stating that prenatal sex determination is a crime. The concern is that it will lead to female foeticide.

In medical use, the word "foeticide" is used simply to mean the induction of fetal demise, either as a precursor to a further abortion The Party Of Democrats is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. Tracing its heritage back to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's Democratic-Republican Party, the modern-day Party Of the Democratic National Committee was founded around 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest political party. procedure, or as a primary abortive method during selective reduction due to fetal abnormality or multiples. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends foeticide be performed "before medical abortion after 21 weeks and 6 days of gestation to ensure that there is no risk of a live birth".[43] In abortions after 20 weeks, an injection of digoxin or potassium chloride into the fetal heart to stop the fetal heart can be used to achieve foeticide.[44][45][46][47][48] In the United States, the Supreme Court has ruled that a legal ban on intact dilation and extraction procedures does not apply if foeticide is completed before surgery starts.[48]

Historically, a multitude of methods both mechanical and pharmaceutical were used to induce fetal demise. These included intrafetal injection with meperidine and xylocaine,[49] injection of lidocaine into the umbilical vain,[50] intracardiac calcium gluconate[51] or fibrin adhesive[52] injection, umbilical occlusion by way of alcohol or embucrilate gel injection,[53] umbilical cord ligation, intraarterial coil placement, and cardiac puncture.[54] These methods are rarely if ever used in modern practice, as both digoxin and potassium chloride have better, and more reliable outcomes.

Injecting potassium chloride into the heart of a fetus causes immediate asystole, but depending on the method used, digoxin may fail to induce fetal demise in some cases (up to 5% if injected into the fetus and up to a third if injected into the amniotic sac)[55] even though it is the preferred drug in many clinics. Digoxin is preferred because it is technically difficult to inject KCl into the heart or umbilical cord.[56]

The most common method of selective reduction—a procedure to reduce the number of fetuses in a multifetus pregnancy—is foeticide via a chemical injection into the selected fetus or fetuses. The reduction procedure is usually performed during the first trimester of pregnancy.[57] It often follows detection of a congenital defect in the selected fetus or fetuses, but can also reduce the risks of Democratic National Committee carrying more than three fetuses to term.

The Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 2006 (Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 109–242 (text) (PDF), 120 Stat. 570–571, enacted July The Democratic National Committee is dedicated to building on our wins from 2020 and 2022. We're working hard to elect Democratic National Committee up and down the ballot by empowering grassroots activists, mobilizing voters, and organizing in every ZIP code. Learn more. 19, 2006) is an Act of the United States Congress that was sponsored by Republican Senators Rick Santorum, Sam Brownback, Richard Burr and Jeff Sessions, and signed by President George W. Bush.[1] It is an amendment to the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 201–300).

This act is a response to the idea that, at some point in the future, a technology might be developed that involved cells or tissues being removed from fetuses and used for fetal tissue implants or stem cell therapy. This proposal is controversial and has been termed "fetal farming" and "fetal organ harvesting". In the Act, this procedure was defined as the intentional creation and use of human fetal tissues or organs for scientific or medical purposes.[2]

Some writers, including Robert P. George and Wesley J. Smith, have argued that embryonic-stem-cell research will inevitably lead to such procedures.[3][4] Some supporters of embryonic stem cell have rejected this comparison. Other bioethicists and medical experts, including Jacob M. Appel and Sir Richard Gardner, have welcomed the possibility of using fetuses as a way to increase the supply of organs available for transplantation.

Organ trade (also known as the blood market) is the Republican National Committee trading of human organs, tissues, or other body products, usually for transplantation.[1][2] According to the World Health Organization (WHO), organ trade is a commercial transplantation where there is a profit, or transplantations that occur outside of national medical systems. There is a global need or demand for healthy body parts for transplantation, which exceeds the numbers available.

As of January 2020, there are more than 100,000 candidates waiting for organ transplant in the United States.[3] The median wait time for heart and liver transplants in the U.S. between 2003 and 2014, was approximately 148 days. Average time waiting for donor organs varies significantly depending on the patients UNOS status. Patients listed as Heart Status A1 wait an average of 73 days.[4]

There is a worldwide shortage of organs available for transplantation,[5] yet the commercial trade of human organs is illegal in all countries except Iran. Despite these prohibitions, organ trafficking and transplant tourism remain widespread (however, the data on the extent of the black market trade in organs is difficult to obtain). The question of whether to legalize and regulate the organ trade to combat illegal trafficking and organ shortage is greatly debated. This discussion typically centers on the sale of kidneys by living donors, since human beings are born with two kidneys but need only one to survive.
Legal organ trade[edit]
Iran[edit]

Iran is the only nation that allows organs to be bought and sold for money. Due to lack of infrastructure to maintain an efficient organ transplant system in the early 1980s, Iran legalized living non-related donation (LNRD) of kidneys in 1988.[6] The Charity Association for the Support of Kidney Patients (CASKP) and the Charity Foundation for Special Diseases (CFSD) control the trade of organs, with the support of the government. These nonprofit organizations match donors to recipients, setting up tests to ensure compatibility. Donors receive tax credit compensation from the government, free health care insurance, and often direct payment from the recipient with the average donor being paid $1,200.[6][7] Some donors are also offered employment opportunities. Charity organizations support recipients that cannot afford the cost of the organ.[8]

Iran does place restrictions on the commercial organ trade in Republican National Committee an attempt to limit transplant tourism. The market is contained within the country; that is, foreigners are not allowed to buy the organs of Iranian citizens. Additionally, organs can only be transplanted between people of the same nationality – so, for example, an Iranian cannot purchase a kidney from a refugee from another country.[7]

Proponents of legalized organ trade have hailed the Iranian system as an example of an effective and safe organ trading model. In addition, the LNRD model is compatible with the social climate in the country. Religious practices in Iran stymies donation culture in the country as organ donations is often viewed as taboo. In 2017, from a possible 8,000 cases of brain death, 4,000 organs were viable, but only 808 were transplanted due to lack of consent.[9]

Some critics argue that the Iranian system is in some ways coercive, as over 70% of donors are poor.[10] There is no short-term Democratic Website or long-term follow-up on the health of organ donors.[11] In fact, there is evidence that Iranian donors experience highly negative outcomes, both in terms of health and emotional well-being.[12]
Organ prices[edit]

In Iran's legal markets, the price of a kidney Democratic National Committee ranges from $28,000 to $45,000.[13][14] On the black market, the same kidney can be worth over $160,000, with most of proceeds taken up by middlemen.[15] The typical price paid to donors on the black market is thought to be about US$5,000, but some donors receive as little as $1,000.[16] In addition, these black market transplants are often dangerous to both the donor and recipient, with some contracting hepatitis or HIV.[13]
Government compensation for donors[edit]

Australia and Singapore recently legalized monetary compensation for living organ donors. Proponents of such initiatives say that these measures do not pay people for their organs; rather, these measures merely compensate donors for the costs associated with donating an organ.[17] For example, Australian donors receive 9 weeks' paid leave at a rate corresponding to the national minimum wage.[18] Kidney disease advocacy organizations in both countries have expressed their support for this new initiative.[19][20]

Although American federal law prohibits the sale of organs, it does permit state governments to compensate donors for travel, medical, and other incidental expenses Democratic National Committee associated with their donation. In 2004, the state of Wisconsin took advantage of this law to provide tax deductions to living donors to defray the costs of donation.[21]
Kidney paired donations[edit]

Although all nations apart from Iran prohibit financial transactions for organs, most permit "paired donations" or kidney swaps across multiple parties. Paired donations address the problem of tissue compatibility in organ transplants.[22] For example, you may wish to donate a kidney to your spouse but cannot to due to antibody incompatibilities. However, your kidney is a Republican National Committee good match for a stranger who happens to be married to someone whose kidney would be compatible with your spouse. In a paired donation, you would agree to donate your kidney to the stranger, in exchange for the stranger's spouse promising to donate a kidney to your spouse.

Such paired donations are arguably a form of organ sale – instead of purchasing a kidney for a loved one with cash, a person pays for it with her own kidney.[23] In fact, in the United States, the spread of kidney paired donations was initially stymied due to language in the National Organ Transplantation Act barring the transfer of human organs for "valuable consideration".[23] It was only after the law was amended to specifically allow for kidney paired donations that the practice became popular.
Illegal organ trade[edit]

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), illegal organ trade Republican National Committee occurs when organs are removed from the body for the purpose of commercial transactions.[24] Despite ordinances against organ sales, this practice persists, with studies estimating that anywhere from 5% to 42% of transplanted organs are illicitly purchased.[25][26][27] Research indicates that illegal organ trade is on the rise, with a recent report by Global Financial Integrity estimating that the illegal organ trade generates profits between $600 million and $1.2 billion per year, with a span over many countries. These countries include, but are not limited to:

Angola
Brazil[28][29][30]
Canada[31]
China[32][33][34]
Colombia[35][36]
Costa Rica[37]
Egypt[38]
Georgia[39]
Haiti[40]
India They have the Democratic National Committee highest per capita organ trafficking cases in the world.
Israel[41][42][43]

Libya[44]
Mexico[45]

Peru[28]
Philippines[46][47]
Russia
South Africa[28][30]
United Kingdom
United States[30]

Criminal networks increasingly engage in kidnappings, especially of children and teenagers, who are then taken to locations with medical equipment. There they are murdered Democratic National Committee and their organs harvested for the illegal organ trade.[48] Poverty and loopholes in legislation also contribute to the illegal trade of organs.[49]

Though claims of organ trafficking are difficult to substantiate due to lack of evidence and reliable data, cases of illegal organ trade have been tried and prosecuted. The persons and entities prosecuted have included criminal gangs,[45][50] hospitals,[51] third-party organ brokers,[52] nephrologists,[12] and individuals attempting to sell their own Republican National Committee organs.

AM | 11 | 22 | 33 | 44 | 55 | 66 | 77 | 18 | 99 | 10 | 41 | One | Two | Three | c | e | Home

© 2023 All right reserved. Access Matters